PlanetsCentral

Keeping 150 planets for 10 consecutive turns is way better winning/ending condition. You know exactly what you need to do in order to win and others know exactly what they need to do to stop you.

So, winning or ending?.. If you mean player that keeps 150 planets should be the winner, who will possess 2nd, 3rd and other places?.. Are you offering to play for just number of planets, without PTScore?..

I prefer if player does his best for his race, even he will not be the first in the game. And if somebody see he can't be the first, he should try to be the second, instead of surrender.

Just put this condition in turn 90 so the fastest win could be achieved turn 100 and everything is fine (at least for me).

I think not more than 5-10% of my games was so long to reach turn 100. As for me it is extremely long game. 60-70 turns should be enough for the short game, 70 and 80 as normal...