PlanetsCentral

Not bad, it's good idea.

But we'd discuss the exact number (300 planets)

And, we'd leave opportunity to end game earlier. For example, player may initiate the vote after turn 60, but all players who has at least 45 planets (500/11) will have "veto" right for stopping until turn 80 or so.

And, we need the rule, how to count players that will not voting at all (it is reality, some of players often just not participate in and no answer...) Think, they are "agree" by default, if they didn't answer for a week.

About 300 planets - it's too much for one (even overkill) player, and 200 planets is too much for second place, I think.

So, one player (leader) will not be able to stop the game without support of others, but, also, the second (even fat) player, that wants to beat the leader, will not be able to continue, without some of support too, or he need to seize 200 planets first.

Is this good enough?.. What you and others think about it?..

I propose the following voting conditions:

1) any player who controls at least one planet has the right to participate in the voting;

2) any player who satisfies item 1 may initiate a vote beginning at the 80th turn;

3) Voting is considered successful if players who control more than 300 planets voted for it;

4) in the case of a positive vote, the winner is the race that controls the largest number of planets.

Game over.